🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has declared it is seeking compensation totaling $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This move represents a direct response by the Kremlin against proposals to use immobilized Russian state assets to aid Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

According to reports in Russian news outlets, the monetary authority filed a claim last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

European Union officials will determine in the coming days regarding a plan to use around €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. The proposal entails providing Ukraine with a large loan to finance its military and financial needs.

The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution acts as the main custodian for the Russian immobilised sovereign wealth.

A Clash Over Legality

EU authorities have maintained that their proposal is on solid legal ground. Their position is based on the principle that ownership of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, despite being it was frozen in EU countries following the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

Moscow, however, has labeled any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. It has threatened reciprocal actions, such as seizing EU corporate assets within Russia.

Kirill Dmitriev, a figure who has assumed a prominent position in diplomatic talks, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and regain its assets. He warned that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the plan.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

With statements interpreted as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the proposal as "a severe attack on the right to ownership and the global financial system established by the United States."

Euroclear declined to provide a statement on the new legal action. It has in the past noted it is contending with over 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions.

Enforcement Challenges

Although courts in European nations are unlikely to recognize judgments from Russian courts, analysts anticipate Moscow to pursue enforcement in countries with stronger relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly nations, provided that such assets can be identified," commented a legal expert from an international firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials indicated they are working on steps to deter other nations from aiding any Russian lawsuits against European companies. Additionally, they are designing protections to protect EU member states with assets in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the detailed plan, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would remain untouched.

Kyiv would only be required to repay the money in the event that Russia consented to pay reparations for the vast damage caused during the ongoing war.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an alternative approach for financing Ukraine. This involves common EU debt issuance to secure a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, demands unanimity among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has already signaled its opposition.

Commenting on Monday, the EU top diplomat, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest option" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, which means it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is equally significant," she stated. "Furthermore, it delivers a powerful signal that when you cause all this destruction to another nation, you have to pay for the rebuilding."